Skip to main content

Featured

Sekilas pokrol bambu (bush lawyer), pengacara praktik hingga advokat Indonesia

Ketika masih berada di bawah kekuasaan kolonial, pemberi layanan hukum kepada rakyat strata bawah mulai dari pembelaan di muka sidang pengadilan sampai pemberian nasihat-nasihat acara berperkara banyak diberikan oleh mereka yang sedikit banyak mempunyai pengalaman bekerja di lingkungan kehakiman; pada waktu-waktu lalu (masa kolonial) itu, mereka sering disebut 'pokrol bambu', suatu penamaan yang terdengar kurang mengenakkan, dalam salah satu tulisannya, Daniel S. Lev menyebut mereka dengan istilah 'bush lawyer'; dalam perkembangan selanjutnya, mereka lazim disebut 'pengacara praktik' (Sutandyo Wignjosoebroto, Hukum dalam Masyarakat, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2008). Salah satu pondasi profesi hukum (tersebut) advokat pada masa kolonial yaitu Stb.1848 No.8, Bepalingen betreffende het kostuum der Rechterlijke Ambtenaren dat der Advokaten, yang kemudian digantikan/dinyatakan tidak berlaku dengan diundangkannya/diberlakukannya UU 18/2003 tentang Advokat yang men...

Pledge of Shares (Challenges) in Indonesian Company Law

1.   Is there any specific provision to regulate (re-)adjustment, (re-)valuation, or whether any splitting of shares is allowed on shares before it’s pledged in the Company Law?

The Company Law doesn’t specifically regulate re-adjustment, re-valuation or splitting before a pledge, but Article 62 jo. 126 (2) subtly provide the valuation of shares based on reasonable market price upon the objection of its shareholder regarding any adverse corporate actions (i.e. a pledge/guaranty burden upon 50% of company’s asset)

2.       Is there any specific dividend payment provision in the insolvency conditions under the Company Law?

The Company Law doesn’t regulate the dividend payment under insolvency, but remaining asset payment after liquidation, Article 71 (3) said that dividend may only be distributed if the Company has a positive profit balance.

3.       Is there any specific provision in Company Law to regulate option rights / pre-emptive right / right of first refusal on the pledgee for the then new issued shares? voting right?

The Company Law   : it’s not regulated for the pledgee, but for the shareholder (pledgor) (Article 43 (1) & (2)), in the other side the Company Law provides such potential regulation in limitation under Article 43 (3)  and Article 60 (4)’s Elucidation that rights other than voting rights may be subject to an agreement entered into by the shareholders and security holders.

In concern to the voting right, Article 60 (4) stipulate that voting rights over pledged shares as collateral or fiduciary guaranty shall be retained by the shareholder.  

In capital market regulations               : rights which is  enclosed to the pledged stock including cash dividend, shares dividend, bonus of shares or other rights in regards with the ownership of the shares/stocks, such rights are not in unity with / not a part of the pledge of stock, (but) still stick along to the right of the pledgor of such stocks for the duration of pledge period, unless stipulated otherwise in the pledge instruction by account holder/pledgor/debtor (basically in nature with the above provision).

4.       Is there any specific provision in Company Law to regulate the reserve fund may be utilized for “free-given” shares to third party?

The Company Law doesn’t regulate the reserve fund for “free-given” shares.

Popular Posts